How different would our world be if most women used a gold club instead of a lawyer when dealing with a cheating husband. Of course I am referring to Tiger Woods and his recent row with his wife Elin Nordegren.
It looks as though Tiger has been unfaithful to his wife at least once and maybe several times during their marriage. The public will probably never know every detail of what Tiger has been up to and that is for the best. However, Tiger’s mysterious car crash of the past week and the circumstances surrounding the crash seem to indicate that his wife decided to act upon Tiger’s infidelity.
Instead of calling a divorce lawyer it appears that she picked up a gold club and gave her husband a lesson on Tough Love. The battered Tiger was reported to be wavering in and out of consciousness when the police arrived on the scene of his car accident. (While driving it’s hard to avoid trees and hydrants when ones head is swimming from being clobbered by a golf club.) He had injuries on his face that required treatment at a nearby hospital. He was shoeless. His auto windows were bashed out. His wife stood nearby with golf club in hand. Nike is Tiger’s sponsor. One has to wonder if some of his facial injuries will bruise into the shape of a Nike logo.
Some of my friends seem to think his wife broke out with the golf club because she hates him for what he did. I have a gut feeling that this is not the case.
The moral of the story is obvious but time will tell whether Tiger learned a lesson from it. Thus far he has been man enough to take his lumps without crying to the police… without slapping her with a restraining order… without throwing her out of the house… all actions of choice for the emasculated. Good for him.
As western men become more and more emasculated western women should have a wide selection of girly-men to select from. Women have the luxury of selecting effeminate mates during times like these, where most places in the western sphere of influence their rights are guaranteed. However, it looks as though we are headed into some not so civilized times where government and society might prove less able to guarantee personal rights and safety to the public at large to include women. Already there are parts of Europe where western women feel obliged to cover their heads because they fear the muslim men who live around them. Where are their men who should be looking after their safety? Probably busy getting their backs waxed.
1. Has not attended a Christian worship service.
2, Has visited several mosques.
3. Has bent knee to the king of Saudi Arabia.
4. Gave his first interview as president on an arab news network.
5. Has promoted his muslim past (before the election he denied it)
6. Is supposedly a confessed apostate. Where is the traditional outrage usually expressed in the muslim world?
Is Obama a closet Muslim? I think there is a good case to support it. Another litmus test is how he approaches the issue of gay rights. If he is a closet muslim he will be intolerant of homosexuality… far more intolerant then a typical christian. Obama’s feet dragging on gay issues might be very telling in regards to his real religious convictions.
John P. Holdren, who is now director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, is an advocate of some radical ideas. It is scary that a top advisor to the president promotes things such as “world of zero net physical growth” and “population limitation”.
A world of zero net physical growth is another way of saying “a world of zero net improvement for its inhabitants”. Holden believes that 1. There are too many people on Earth and 2. The people who are here need to stop growing.
What exactly does the term “stop growing” mean to average citizens of the world? Limits to family size comes to mind. Limits to possession of goods and services. Limits to land ownership (if it is allowed at all). Limits to the accumulation of wealth (for some people).
I have to emphasize the accumulation of wealth FOR SOME PEOPLE. Holdren cannot honestly expect us to believe that his vision will apply to all of the people of the world. What he envisions might apply to 99% of us but will it apply to the world’s elite? It seems doubtful when you look at today’s eco-evangelists. Let’s look at Al Gore for example.
Gore jets around, when not inhabiting his over-sized mansion, telling everybody else how much they need to change their lifestyles. Gore’s carbon footprint is gigantic compared to those whom he wants to limit.
This is probably a glimpse of the future looking us in the face. A small number of elitists placing limits of growth on the rest of the world’s inhabitants. This not only keeps 99% of mankind under foot, but it also lays the earth and its remaining resources at the feet of the elite 1%. They can use what they want, nobody else is allowed.
Information for this post came partially from this website…
The whole swine flu hype is starting to get seriously annoying. Apparently swine flu is moving about the world waiting for its chance to get real nasty when the weather gets cold in the Northern Hemisphere.
The weather is already cold in Argentina where it is now winter. The swine flu is making itself known but it seems to pack more bark then bite. Here is a NYT article from early July 09…
It reports 2800 confirmed cases of the swine flu (perhaps up to 100K unconfirmed). Officials contribute 44 deaths to swine flu. Whew! That’s not exactly scary sounding. It just does not sound scary enough to justify the hype. However, from a drug manufacturer’s perspective the hype is helping to create wealth on an enormous scale.
Governments all over the world are ordering swine flu vaccine even though there is no evidence that the vaccine will prevent anyone from getting sick. Also the vaccine has not been properly tested and presents a risk for the vaccinated. The vaccine may well do more harm then good but who really cares about risk as long as the pharmaceutical companies bag a fortune during the supposed crisis?
It’s interesting to note that it is the governments that are buying the vaccine to use on the peoples of the world. If it were left up to world citizens to pay for their own shots I think that much less money would probably be made by the pharmaceuticals and their political minions. By governments jumping in to save the day we all pay, regardless of whether we want a shot or not. We pay and the drug companies and their cronies profit.
To make the whole mess smell even worse, there is talk of forcing people to receive the vaccine. The vaccine has not been properly tested to ensure it does what it is supposed to do. It has not been tested to ensure that it does not cause harmful side effects. If your children are harmed by the vaccine your legal options are limited by law. If the vaccine harms you your legal options are limited by law.
It’s a sweet deal for the drug companies as they offer a product that consumers are possibly forced to consume. They are protected from lawsuits by the government. They make a boat load of money while doing it.
France announced this week that it is ending its 40 year break from NATO. You can read about it HERE but in a nutshell the French government has decided non-membership in NATO now threatens its independence. An odd perspective considering the French pulled out of NATO because Charles de Gaulle thought that membership undermined Frances sovereignty.
What has changed that led to Frances change of heart? NATO is slowly morphing into a tool of the EU’s “High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy”. This office is currently held by Javier Solana. Here’s a list of Solana’s responsibilities and titles…
Solana is easily the most powerful man in Europe having control over EU defense and policies. He certainly has one of the largest titles. In 2003 he crafted an agreement with NATO giving his office control of NATO assets during crisis situations. NATO has many assets and some of them are nuclear.
During his announcement Mr Sarkozy said there was no sense in France - a founder member of Nato - having no say in the organisation’s decisions on military strategy. ”This rapprochement with Nato ensures our national independence,” said Mr Sarkozy. “To distance ourselves would limit our independence and our room for manoeuvre. We have to be progressive,” he said. “A solitary nation is a nation that has no influence whatsoever. We need strong diplomacy, a strong defence and a strong Europe.”
If NATO has become the EU’s military instrument then France can no longer afford to not be involved.
Here is their mission statement as posted at their site…
“Throw Them All Out America is dedicated to three propositions: 1) punishing all Congressional incumbents (both House and Senate) for the debacle known as the 2008 Mortgage Meltdown &Wall Street Bailout by throwing them all out of office; 2) replacing the entire corrupt Washington congressional culture with individuals from Main Street who will work to accomplish what is best for America; and, 3) organizing at the grassroots level to term limit all members of Congress via the power of the vote.”
I would add a #4 to the list… Retroactively re-evaluate and adjust congressional pay and perks.
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful." -- C.S. Lewis
Contact
Subscribe
Dec 2, 2009 
2 Comments 
